AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Spamsieve quot10.6.89/3/2023 ![]() ![]() Subject: Designer Footwear from Gucci Prada Chanel & More, buy direct, forget department store prices I’m reverting back to 2.6.5 to see if the problem persists. This seems to have started when I upgraded to 2.6.6. I looked at my whitelist and saw a number of very suspicious addresses on it, which make me think SS has missed more of the false negatives I’ve trained manually. But SS has no record of my marking it, so it kept the address in the whitelist and let other spams with that address through. I mark all spam that gets through as false positives, and I specifically remember marking this one, as I thought the subject was particularly weird. The log shows Spam Sieve marking it as good, but there’s no entry that shows where I marked it as a false positive. Notice the entries for, the subject wonyun. ![]() I’ve reproduced an example from my log below. It looks like SpamSieve is sometimes not acknowledging when I train a false positive. I dug through my log and I noticed something strange. There are two problems, there was a misconfiguration on my part, and the rules are overly specific. Even though it has 730+ blocklist rules, and filtered over 73k words, not a single message has been flagged as spam. Before I might get one a day in my inbox, but now I’m seeing six or seven, sometimes more. After flagging over 500 messages as spam, SpamSieve has blocked exactly zero (0). Over the past few weeks Spam sieve has been letting more spam through than it has been. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |